Contested grounds: a non-binary isotopic approach to sex and gender in precolonial coastal Brazil
Barra lateral del artículo
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
A menudo se ha señalado a la bioarqueología como el bastión más arraigado de las perspectivas binarias de sexo y género en la arqueología. Hay algo de ironía en esto, ya que les bioarqueólogues son les más familiarizades con la plasticidad biosocial del esqueleto. En este artículo, reexamino los datos isotópicos (δ13C, δ15N) y mortuorios del sitio Armação do Sul (Florianópolis, Brasil) que se abordaron previamente desde una perspectiva binaria normativa, esta vez a través de una lente no-binaria. Resalto las diferencias corporales impresas por prácticas alimentarias y mortuorias que se orientaron en el mundo sociomaterial, agregando variables que expresan otras formas de diferenciación además del dimorfismo sexual y que enfatizan la interseccionalidad en las configuraciones sociales.
Detalles del artículo
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Creative Commons. Atribución-NoComercial 4.0 Internacional (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Citas
Abu-Lughod, L. (1990). Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography? Women & Performance: a journal of feminist theory, 5, 7–27.
Agarwal, S. C. (2012). A Bioarchaeology of Social Identity (in New Directions in Bioarchaeology Part II). The SAA Archaeological Record, 29–31.
Agarwal, S. C. & Glencross, B. A. (2011). Building a Social Bioarchaeology. In S. C. Agarwal & B. A. Glencross (Eds.), Social Bioarchaeology (pp. 1–12). Chichester U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell.
Alberti, B. (2005). Bodies In Prehistory: Beyond the Sex/Gender Split. In P. P. Funari, A. Zarankin, & E. Stovel (Eds.), Global archaeological theory: contextual voices and contemporary thoughts (pp. 107–120). New York: Kluwer.
Anzaldúa, G. (1987). Borderlands/ La Frontera: The New Mestiza. San Francisco: Spinsters/ Aunt Lute.
Arwill-Nordbladh, E. (1998). Archaeology, Gender, And Emancipation: The Paradox of Hanna Rydh. In Excavating Women: A History of Women In European Archaeology (pp. 152–170). London: Routledge.
Atalay, S. & Hastorf, C. A. (2006). Food, Meals, and Daily Activities: Food Habitus at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. American Antiquity, 71, 283–319.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe in the Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Barthes, R. (1979). Toward a Psychosociology of Contemporary Food Consumption. In R. Forster & O. Ranum (Eds.), Food and drink in history. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
Battle-Baptiste, W. (2011). Black Feminist Archaeology. Walnut Creek: Routledge.
Beauvoir, S. de. (1949). The Second Sex. London: Vintage Classic.
Bell, C. (1992). Ritual Theory, Ritual Practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bennett, J. (2010). Vibrant Matter: A Political Ecology of Things. Durham/London: Duke University Press.
Bolger, D. (2012). Gender Prehistory: The Story So Far. En A Companion to Gender Prehistory (pp. 1–19). West Sussex, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Buikstra, J. E. & Ubelaker, D. H. (Eds.). (1994). Standards for data collection from Human Skeletal Remains. Fayetteville: Arkansas Archaeological Survey.
Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of “Sex.”New York: Routledge.
Carneiro, S. & Santos, T. (1985). Mulher Negra. São Paulo: Nobel/Conselho Estadual da Condição Feminina.
Caromano, C. F., Gaspar, M. V., Pereira, E. R., Lima, M. do N. & Lima, J. C. F. de. (2017). Nem Todas São Betty Ou Anna: O Lugar Das Arqueólogas No Discurso Da Arqueologia Amazônica. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, 30, 115–129.
Champion, S. (1998). Women In British Archaeology: Visible and Invisible. In Excavating Women: A History of Women In European Archaeology (pp. 171–191). London: Routledge.
Claassen, C. & Joyce, R. A. (Eds.). (1997). Women in Prehistory: North America and Mesoamerica. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Clastres, P. (1977). Society Against the State. New York: Urizen Books.
Conkey, M. W. & Spector, J. (1984). Archaeology And the Study of Gender. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory, 7, 1–38.
Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 14, 538–554.
Croucher, K. (2005). Queerying Near Eastern archaeology. World Archaeology, 37, 610–620.
Davis, A. (1981). Women, race, and class. New York: Random House.
DeBlasis, P., Gaspar, M. & Kneip, A. (2021). Sambaquis from the Southern Brazilian Coast: Landscape Building and Enduring Heterarchical Societies throughout the Holocene.Land, 10, 1–27.
DeMasi, M. A. N. (1991). Escavações Arqueológicas Do Pe. João Alfredo Rohr: O Assentamento Da Armação Do Sul, SC, Brasil (Master Thesis). Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos, São Leopoldo.
Dommasnes, L. H. (1992). Two Decades of Women In Prehistory And In Archaeology In Norway: A Review. Norwegian Archaeological Review, 1–14.
Douglas, M. (1972). Deciphering a Meal. Daedalus, 101, 61–81.
Dowson, T. A. (2000). Homosexuality, Queer Theory and Archaeology. In J. Thomas (Ed.), Interpretive Archaeology: A Reader (pp. 283–289). London: Leicester University Press.
Engelstad, E. (2007). Much More than Gender. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 14, 217–234.
Escobar, E. (2008). TerritoriesofDifference: Place,Movements, Life, Redes. Durham: Duke University Press.
Escórcio, E. & Gaspar, M. D. (2005). Indicadores de Diferenciação Social e de Gênero dos Pescadores-Coletores que Ocuparam a Região dos Lagos – RJ. Cadernos do LEPAARQ, 8, 47–65.
Franklin, M. (2001). A Black Feminist-Inspired Archaeology? Journal of Social Archaeology, 1, 108–125.
Fredel, K. (2015). Arqueologia de Gênero. Erechim: Habilis.
Friedan, B. (1963). The Feminine Mystique. New York: Norton.
Fuglestvedt, I. (2014). Declaration on Behalf of an Archaeology of Sexe. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 21, 46–75.
Geller, P. L. (2005). Skeletal Analysis And Theoretical Complications. World Archaeology, 37, 597–609.
Geller, P. L. (2008a). Conceiving Sex: Fomenting A Feminist Bioarchaeology. Journal of Social Archaeology, 8, 113–138.
Geller, P. L. (2008b). Identity And Difference: Complicating Gender In Archaeology. Annual Review of Anthropology, 38, 65–81.
Gero, J. M. (1985). Socio-Politics and the Woman-at-Home Ideology. American Antiquity, 50, 342–350.
Gero, J. M. & Conkey, M. W. (Eds.). (1991). Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory. Oxford: Blackwell.
Ghisleni, L., Jordan, A. M. & Fioccoprile, E. (2016). Introduction to Binary Binds: Deconstructing Sex and Gender Dichotomies in Archaeological Practice. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 765–787.
Gilchrist, R. (1994). Gender And Material Culture: The Archaeology of Religious Women. London; New York: Routledge.
Gilchrist, R. (1999).Gender And Archaeology: Contesting The Past. London; New York: Routledge.
Gontijo, F. de S. & Schaan, D. P. (2017). Sexualidade e Teoria Queer Apontamentos para a Arqueologia e para a Antropologia Brasileiras. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, 30, 51–70.
Gonzalez, L. (1982). A Mulher Negra Na Sociedade Brasileira. In M. Luz (Ed.), O Lugar Da Mulher (pp. 87–106). Rio de Janeiro: Graal.
Haraway, D. (1988). Situated Knowledges: The Science Question In Feminism As A Site Of Discourse In The Privilege Of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies, 14, 575–600.
Hartemann, G. (2019). Nem Ela, Nem Ele: Por Uma Arqueologia (Trans*) Além Do Binário. Revista Arqueologia Pública, 13.
Hastorf, C. (1991). Gender, Space, and Food in Prehistory. In J. M. Gero & M. W. Conkey (Eds.), Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory (pp. 132–163). Oxford: Blackwell.
Hodder, I. (1997). “Always Momentary, Fluid and Flexible”: Towards A Reflexive Excavation Methodology. Antiquity, 71, 691–700.
Hooks, bell. (1984). Feminist Theory: From Margin to Center. New York: South End Press.
Jácome, C., & Furquim, L. (2019). Gender and Feminism in Brazilian Archaeology. En C. Smith (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology. Cham: Springer.
Joyce, R. A. (2000). A Precolumbian Gaze: Male Sexuality Among the Ancient Maya. En R. A. Schmidt & B. L. Voss (Eds.), Archaeologies of Sexuality (pp. 263–283). London; New York: Routledge.
Landa, B. dos S. (1999). Arqueologia Guarani e Gênero. Revista do CEPA, 23, 209–254.
Laqueur, T. W. (1992). Making Sex: Body And Gender From The Greeks To Freud. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Lessa, A., & Scherer, L. Z. (2008). O Outro Lado Do Paraíso: Novos Dados e Reflexões Sobre Violência Entre Pescadores-Coletores Pré-Coloniais. Revista do Museu de Arqueologia e Etnologia, 89.
Lima, D. V. R. de, Castro, V. M. C. de & Silva, S. F. S. M. da. (2012). Arqueologia de Gênero: Uma Análise Crítica da Construção Histórica do Passado. Clio. Série Arqueológica, 27, 49–91.
Lima, T. A. (1995). Pratos e Mais Pratos: Louças Domésticas, Divisões Culturais e Limites Sociais no Rio de Janeiro, Século XIX. Anais do Museu Paulista: História e Cultura Material, 3, 129–191.
Lima, T. A. (1997).Chá e Simpatia: Uma Estratégia de Gênero no Rio de Janeiro Oitocentista. Anais do Museu Paulista: História e Cultura Material, 5, 93–129.
Longino, H. E. (1987). Can There Be a Feminist Science? Hypatia, 2, 51–64.
Longino, H. E. (1990). Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lugones, M. (1987). Playfulness, “World”-Travelling, and Loving Perception. Hypatia, 2, 3–19.
Marshall, Y. & Alberti, B. (2014). A Matter of Difference: Karen Barad, Ontology and Archaeological Bodies. Cambridge Archaeological Journal, 24, 19–36.
Matić, U. (2012). To Queer or Not To Queer? That Is the Question: Sex/Gender, Prestige And Burial No. 10 On The Mokrin Necropolis. Dacia (Bucuresti), 56, 169–185.
Meskell, L. (1999). Archaeologies of Social Life: Age, Sex, Class et cetera in Ancient Egypt. Oxford: Blackwell.
Mignolo, W. D. (2000).Local History/Global Designs: Coloniality, Subaltern Knowledges And Border Thinking. Princeton University Press.
Moral, E. (2016). Qu(e)erying Sex and Gender in Archaeology: A Critique of the “Third” and Other Sexual Categories. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 23, 1–22.
Nelson, M., Nelson, S. & Wylie, A. (Eds.). (1994). Equity Issues for Women in Archaeology. Washington, D.C.: American Anthropological Association.
Neves, W. A. (1988). Paleogenética dos Grupos Pré-Históricos do Litoral Sul do Brasil (Paraná e Santa Catarina). Pesquisas, Antropologia, 43, 178.
Nicholson, L. (1994). Interpreting “Gender.” Signs, 79–105.
Okumura, M. (2008). Diversidade Morfológica Craniana, Micro-Evolução E Ocupação Pré-Histórica Da Costa Brasileira. Pesquisas, Antropologia, 66, 306.
Oliveira, L. & Klokler, D. (2018). Bodies, Offerings, Rituals and Genders at the Justino, Lower São Francisco. Revista Habitus, 16, 103–124.
Oppitz, G. (2015). Coisas que Mudam: Os Processos de Mudança nos Sítios Conchíferos Catarinenses e um Olhar Isotópico sobre o caso do Sitio Armação do Sul, Florianópolis/SC (Master Thesis). Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo.
Oppitz, G., Bastos, M. Q. R., Scherer, L. Z., Lessa, A., Martins, V., Camargo, P. & DeBlasis, P. (2018). Pensando Sobre Mobilidade, Dieta e Mudança Social: Análises Isotópicas no Sítio Armação Do Sul, Florianópolis/SC. Cadernos do LEPAARQ, 15, 237–266.
Pearson, J., Grove, M., Özbek, M. & Hongo, H. (2013). Food And Social Complexity At Çayönü Tepesi, Southeastern Anatolia: Stable Isotope Evidence of Differentiation In Diet According To Burial Practice And Sex In The Early Neolithic. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology, 32, 180–189.
Pearson, J. & Meskell, L. (2015). Isotopes and Images: Fleshing out Bodies at Çatalhöyük. J Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory, 22, 461–482.
Pessis, A.-M. (2005). Arqueologia E Gênero: Teoria e Fato Arqueológico. Clio. Série Arqueológica, 18, 13–25.
Pinto, C. R. J. (2003). Uma história do feminismo no Brasil. São Paulo: Editora Fundação Perseu Abramo.
Pinto, R. (2015). Museus e Diversidade Sexual: Reflexões Sobre Mostras LGBT E Queer. Revista Arqueologia Pública, 5, 44.
Ribeiro, L. (2013). Maria, Párvola Exposta, Domingos, Padre Maculado. Ensaio de Arqueologia Micro Histórica. Vestígios, 6, 129–180.
Ribeiro, L. (2017). Crítica Feminista, Arqueologia e Descolonialidade: Sobre Resistir Na Ciência. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, 30, 210–234.
Roedel, L. de A. (2017). O Silêncio do Corpo: Intersexualidade Invisibilizada no Cemitério do Bonfim. Revista de Arqueologia da SAB, 30, 71–85.
Rohr, J. A. (1974). Armação do Sul: Três Mil Anos De História. Correio do Povo.
Rohr, J. A. & Andreatta, M. D. (1969). O Sítio Arqueológico da Armação do Sul (Nota Prévia). Pesquisas, Antropologia, 20, 135–138.
Roughgarden, J. (2004). Evolution’s Rainbow: Diversity, Gender, And Sexuality In Nature And People. Berkeley; London: University of California Press.
Rubin, G. (1975). The Traffic in Women: Notes On The Political Economy Of Sex. In Toward An Anthropology Of Women (pp. 157–210). New York: Monthly Review.
Schaan, D. P. (2001). Estatuetas Antropomorfas Marajoara: O Simbolismo de Identidades de Gênero em uma Sociedade Complexa Amazônica. Boletim do Museu Paraense Emilio Goeldi. Antropologia, 17, 437–477.
Scherer, L. Z. (2012). Marcadores De Estresse Músculo-Esquelético E Mobilidade Terrestre Em Grupos Pré-Coloniais Litorâneos Do Sul Do Brasil (Master Thesis). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro.
Schmitz, P. I., DeMasi, M. A. N., Verardi, I., Lavina, R. & Jacobus, A. L. (1992). O Sítio Arqueológico da Armação Do Sul. Pesquisas, Antropologia, 48, 220.
Scott, J. W. (1986). Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis. The American Historical Review, 91, 1053–1075.
Sene, G. A. M. (2003). Rituais Funerários e Processos Culturais: Os Caçadores-Coletores e Horticultores Pré-Históricos Do Noroeste De Minas Gerais. Canindé, 3, 105–133.
Sofaer, J. R. (2006). The Body as Material Culture: a Theoretical Osteoarchaeology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Spector, J. (1993). What This Awl Means: Feminist Archaeology At A Wahpeton Dakota Village. Minneapolis: Minnesota Historical Society Press.
Spencer-Wood, S. M. (2011).Introduction: Feminist Theories and Archaeology. Archaeologies, 7, 1–33.
Spivak, G. C. (1988). Can the Subaltern Speak? Marxism And the Interpretation of Culture. Urbana/Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
Stockett, M. K. & Geller, P. L. (2006). Feminist Anthropology: Perspectives on Our Past, Present, And Future. In Feminist Anthropology: Past, Present, And Future (pp. 1–19). Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Stoller, R. J. (1968). Sex And Gender. London: Hogarth; Institute of Psycho-analysis.
Voss, B. L. (2000). Feminisms, Queer Theories, And the Archaeological Study of Past Sexualities. World Archaeology, 32, 180–192.
Voss, B. L. (2005). Sexual Subjects. Identity And Taxonomy in Archaeological Research. In The Archaeology of Plural and Changing Identities: Beyond Identification (pp. 55–77). New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
Wylie, A. (1982). Epistemological Issues Raised by A Structural Archaeology. In I. Hodder (Ed.), Symbolic and Structural Archaeology (pp. 39–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wylie, A. (1989). Archaeological Cables and Tacking: The Implications of Practice for Bernstein’s ‘Options beyond Objectivism and Relativism.’ Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 19, 1–18.